• macattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fuck a corporations but let’s not act like piracy is the modern version of Robin Hood or righting a huge injustice

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      At some level it happens due to people wanting stuff for free… but if it’s the consequence of that is that works are preserved and disseminated, that’s more valuable for our culture than when companies vault them and lose them, or when they never release them at all, like Warner has been doing lately.

      One might say that these companies have all the right to make these works unavailable, but this is clearly a situation where the “proper” is more detrimental than the “clandestine”. After all, the way these companies handle it, when the ridiculously excessive copyright length is over and the works are supposed to cease their artificial monopoly and be returned to the Public Domain from which everyone takes inspiration, there might be nothing left. A DVD is unlikely to last 100 years.

      This is not a matter of life and death but culture has its value.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most people don’t have the understanding to fully appreciate the consequences of the current system of “free” services. That’s why it’s the job of governments to put robust consumer protections in place. The Europeans have been making some moves in the right direction, lately. Unfortunately, they also increasingly have been veering towards totalitarianism in their moves to enforce mandatory trusted certificates, weakening of encryption and other hare-brained schemes.

    • SitD@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not a proud pirate, but I’ll never be a proud data harvest free-for-all resource. there is no glamour to any of this, but I will patiently await a reasonable offering. in the music industry it also worked. as well as the video game industry. you can easily buy honest drm free games

    • hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean yeah it’s selfish, but it is definitely righting a huge injustice:

      There is literally no customer centric way to watch these shows, or most modern media at all. Where can I literally buy shows that I can then resell. Where can I get a subscription service that’s focused on giving me the best content possible and not trying to squeeze value out of me by influencing what I watch or selling my metrics or up selling me to a bigger plan after killing the previous plan or any number of other dark practices. Where can I buy DRM free offline files of these shows so I can watch them on an airplane on my own hardware without Internet?

      It’s fucked up that there is literally no way for people to buy their entertainment and not be fucked over more for trying to do it the legal way and spending money. And piracy needs to exist as a breaking point to stop these companies from getting even worse.

      • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hence why the people on the internet needs to reject people coming here to profit.

        There’s no middle ground in trying to keep the internet good and having it be a platform to hock stuff.

        We should go back to the roots. Promote collaboration and be hostile to those people trying to manufacture scarcity online

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not against platforms, if they actually compete on features and not content.

          This somewhat works for music. Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer, YT music all have pretty much the same catalog.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you are a gullible consumer whose devices are always connected to the internet, you don’t notice you’re getting a worse service. Unfortunately, way too many people are falling for this.

        Luckily, at least PC gamers are largely outspoken about DRM and there are pretty popular platforms that cater to them. But console games and media (other than some e-books)? No end of DRM in sight.

      • adrian783@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        in a pretty limited, cultural archival and dissemination point of view, mayyyyyyyyybe.

        the vast majority just want free entertainment.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they want easily accessible entertainment for a reasonable price.

          Currently I’m supposed to pay 3-4 services at 10-15€ to get a somewhat reasonable library. There’s up to 60€, each month. For a collection of services, that I’m realistically using maybe 2h a day. That’s completely unreasonable.

          And if you see, that especially Netflix seems to spend 90% of that money on extremely low quality crap, this price tag seems even less reasonable.

          • hansl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            How much would you be willing to pay for your entertainment? Historically 1$/hour isn’t a bad deal. Games used to cost double that on average. Movies have always been 5-10$ per hour if adjusted for inflation. A book is cheaper (say, 20$ for maybe 60h of reading), but an audiobook is around that 1$/hour you’re complaining about.

            If you’re really complaining about how you cannot afford to be entertained, I’d surmise it’s a salary problem where the minimum wage hasn’t followed inflation almost everywhere on earth, and not the price of entertainment itself.

            My issue with streaming isn’t a cost but a categorization. Even if I subscribe to five services there always seems to be two problems; 1. how do I find shit to watch and on what service, and 2. there always seem to have that elusive content that I haven’t subscribed to and would take me ten minutes to add all my information which honestly is just a blocker. I want TV to be more like music is right now (from a UX), even if I have to pay extra for that convenience.

            • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m absolutely able to pay 100€ a month, for me personally it’s not a salary problem.

              But I’m comparing streaming to public access TV here in Germany, which is currently 18€ per month and household and somehow manages to produce something like 20 TV channels, 50 radio stations, tons of podcasts, top notch news coverage, pensions for thousands of old journalists and doing all of that within the famously efficient German bureaucracy. So, how exactly is Netflix spending its money? Especially if you keep in mind that they can distribute most of their self-produced content worldwide.

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I am not advocating for regulations or for people to stop I don’t think that we are entitled to someone else’s work. I guess you could try to justify it for works of art that were publicly funded.