alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoNo, it is wrong. Machine code is not source code.
minus-squarenewIdentity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoA decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
minus-squareamki@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoFrom the point of view of the decompiler machine code is indeed the source code though
minus-squaretastysnacks@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoTry converting from English to Japanese and back to English.
minus-squareamki@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoA fancy way to say do nothing is not the same as translating back and forth. Example: Show me the intermediate translation. Also we live in a 64bit world now old man
No, it is wrong. Machine code is not source code.
Never heard of a decompiler I see.
A decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
From the point of view of the decompiler machine code is indeed the source code though
Try converting from English to Japanese and back to English.
xor ax, axA fancy way to say do nothing is not the same as translating back and forth. Example: Show me the intermediate translation.
Also we live in a 64bit world now old man