In short, we aren’t on track to an apocalyptic extinction, and the new head is concerned that rhetoric that we are is making people apathetic and paralyzes them from making beneficial actions.

He makes it clear too that this doesn’t mean things are perfectly fine. The world is becoming and will be more dangerous with respect to climate. We’re going to still have serious problems to deal with. The problems just aren’t insurmountable and extinction level.

  • HWK_290@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well by all means, let’s make it seem less serious than it is! That’ll get people moving

    Signed, an actual fucking climate scientist

    • jemorgan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you even read the article, Mr/Ms climate scientist?

      He’s asking people not to talk like the world is going to catastrophically end once we hit that 1.5 degrees milestone, because it’s making people feel hopeless and apathetic, which is actually slowing our efforts to change.

      And he’s totally right. If the government told people a meteor the size of Texas was going to impact earth in 12 hours, there would be effectively zero effort to stop it. If you tune in to a lot of the conversation around climate change from people who are not climate scientists, but who want to leave a better world for their kids and believe climate scientists, they feel hopeless. It feels like a foregone conclusion that we are going to go over the 1.5 degree goal (probably because it is), and if we think the biosphere is going to collapse when it does, it is really, really hard to take action.

      It’s not saying to undersell the risks, he’s saying to be truthful about the risks. We can definitely still salvage complex life on earth with optimistic, consistent effort, but recent media coverage has been giving the impression that it’s too late. This is bad and counterproductive.

      Keep on fighting the good fight brother/sister.

      • heeplr@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        because it’s making people feel hopeless and apathetic, which is actually slowing our efforts to change.

        That’s the thing I don’t get. How to come to such a conclusion?

        If you ever have been on a sinking ship, you know how suddenly even the worst enemies will cooperate willingly quite well in face of time pressure and a life threat. Some might even be willing to sacrifice themselves when in such a situation, even a few minutes gained can make a huge difference. But aswell if the situation seems hopeless.

        It’s totally atypical for most humans to just accept fate and relax in any life threatening situation. Humans tend to die fighting/ defending.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          they want a slow boil, keeps the panic down and diminishes the odds there will be a ‘bastards up against the wall’ moment for the ones responsible.

          • heeplr@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            there will be a ‘bastards up against the wall’ moment for the ones responsible.

            i can’t see how that could prevent that. Quite the opposite, if half-assed efforts (without “state of emergency”) lead to higher impact, people will get angrier than with lower impact, simply because more will have to struggle harder.

          • heeplr@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            climate change unstoppable != scary life threatening consequences

            Those are two entirely different narratives.

            (And I didn’t get past the paywall.)

            • jemorgan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Homie I’m trying to explain what you’re obviously not understanding about this, and you keep responding with arguments about how you’re correct to not understand or something?

              Guy said “don’t be hyperbolic about the 1.5c goal because if people feel hopeless they are less likely to act.” We shouldn’t be acting like the scary life threatening consequences of climate change are unstoppable. That is one narrative, you silly goof.

              • heeplr@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Guy said “don’t be hyperbolic about the 1.5c goal because if people feel hopeless they are less likely to act.”

                Then he’s wrong. But it’s more likely you misread the study since that’s not the conclusion.

                • jemorgan@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My guy I can only imagine how hard it must be to go through life completely illiterate.

                  “The belief that climate change is unstoppable reduces the behavioural and policy response to climate change and moderates risk perception.”

                  • heeplr@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    So you are saying

                    “The belief that climate change is unstoppable”

                    is the same thing as

                    “a temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius is an existential threat to humanity”

                    Those are fundamentially different things and you just pulled some study you think is fitting to OPs article. But allright… I’m the one who’s illiterate.

    • SirStumps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I understand his sentiment. I have an overwhelming feeling of powerlessness because most CO2 emissions aren’t even made by normal every day people but the entities that do create a majority of it don’t care. This means anything we attempt to do is as a whole is only a drop in the bucket compared to what these entities are producing. I purchased a hybrid vehicle to curve my driving emissions and I recycle. I planted grass and a tree in my yard to prevent run off and produce oxygen. I am looking into getting solar power for my home but I am not a rich man so the price is a little beyond me right now. Things I can do I try to do but in the end regardless of what I do entities are polluting our water and air, producing plastics, and are trying to place the blame on normal people. It can be a little heavy on the soul.

      • ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Add a few wildflowers to your grass, it’s better for insects (and should not be that expensive).