• 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lighting’s connector itself is great - cables should absolutely be male and USB messed up in that regard. The locking mechanism is also far superior, and overall I’ve had 4 USB C ports fail, 2 due to the locking mechanism and 2 due to the inner male part of the port breaking - these are issues far less with lightning.

    That said, the restrictive data speeds and restriction on who can use it, both of which are down to apple, do have a hit on it.

    If it was possible to do something along the lines of USB 3.2 (which it should be as USB A manages it with 5 pins vs lightning’s 8/16) over a lightning connector that’d be way better than USB C but you can’t really force apple to give everyone else a proprietary component

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Type C can’t be similar to lightning wrt the advantages you’re describing because apple prevents it through patents. So you can thank apple for a worse type c design than necessary.

    • Knuschberkeks@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the iPhone 15 still only supports USB 2.0 speeds over the USB-C port. only the Pro models get bumped up to USB3.

        • Knuschberkeks@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure. I haven’t looked into this, but it might be that the USB controller sits on the SoC. Non-Pro iPhone 15 uses the same SoC as the 14 Pro. To get USB 3 speeds you need to re-engineer the SoC, which adds a huge amount of cost. I expect the iPhone 16 to have USB 3 across the board.