The March 14 directive, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections.

According to the memo, agents can break into a home if getting a warrant is “impracticable,” and they don’t need a judge’s approval. Instead, immigration officers can sign their own administrative warrants. The bar for action is low — a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang is enough.

  • danarchyintheATL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    Reminder that many states have “STAND YOUR GROUND” laws that include protecting you in the event you shoot someone claiming to be a federal agent who doesn’t produce badges or a warrant.

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Funny you think people will still get a fair trial (or even a trial at all instead of a bullet or “accident”) in the United States after shooting someone from the regime.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      it’s encouraging to see Americans who still believe the law means anything. I hope you manifest it back into existence.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fun Fact: In Indiana, you can legally convert ICE agents into a fine red mist if they try this.

    They have no legal protections while breaking the law.

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Problem is… It then gets reduced to you shooting at people, and people shooting at you. That’s seems like lose lose situation.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is a blatant violation of the 4th Amendment, and they are counting on the Supreme Court to back then, which they won’t. Then they’ll just ignore the Supreme Court, and do it anyway.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Agree. They need to be extremely afraid of us. Politicians are greedy cowards, and they only respond to money and fear. We don’t have money to bribe them like the Sociopathic Oligarchs, so we have to make their fear of us overwhelm their greed.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    So… where is that outrage from preppers and gun enthusaists of the government barging into their homes?

    Can you image if Biden, Obama, or even Bush did this?

    There would literally be a massive armed mob outside the White House.

    Turns out guns are useless in the face of propaganda, I guess.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Turns out guns are useless in the face of propaganda, I guess.

      This is the real takeaway. Orwell was right about a lot of shit, but the use of language as a means of control was extra prescient.

    • AlexLost@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      See they are not coming for their guns, so there does not appear to be a problem. Yet.

  • Owl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 days ago

    Considering ICE likes to abduct people in masks, civilian clothing and without any identification and thus are easily confused with burglars, i’d say shoot on sight for trespassing would be a viable option.

  • the_trash_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 days ago

    Read as: Enter your home under the false pretense they’re looking for migrants, so they can search for any reason to charge you with a crime and toss you in a camp.

  • nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    221
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well, constitutionally, they can’t for whatever that’s worth now.

    That bold faced liar can go right to hell.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      127
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Looking forward to this being challenged in a state with Stand Your Ground laws where warrantless trespassing is legally the same as any other trespassing.

      I’m personally opposed to lethal force being used to protect property in general, but there are places where that is essentially legal due to Stand Your Ground laws.

      • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        96
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Your opposed to it, but now you also see the sole reason the 2nd exists. If ever the government does something like warrantless trespassing, it’s our civic duty to use our 2nd amendment rights to remind them we oppose tyranny. That said, never thought this would happen in our lifetimes. Worlds a changing.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          There are very few people who would survive this tactic though.

          Still seems like a stupid plan—2nd amendment or not (which is really not what the 2nd was about before courts made it anyway). At best you take one with you on the way out, if you’re ready when they break in. At this point I’d still rather be detained than dead.

          • arrow74@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            If everyone they illegally targeted managed to take one this problem would be quickly resolved

            • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Any statement that begins with “If everyone one…” is going to be followed by something that would be great, but won’t happen. As much as we may both 100% believe it should.

          • K☰NOPSIK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            At this point I’d still rather be detained than dead.

            I’m well past that point. Especially with this fascist dictatorship. Being detained will likely get us tortured or thrown into a concentration camp. I’d rather die resisting these fuckers than die in some torture room.

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              4 days ago

              ^ This, 100%

              Some of us don’t have the luxury to keep our heads down and blend in when fascists want to target those who are “different.” That’s why I am outspoken about it - I can’t hide who I am, and even if I could, I’d refuse to live a lie.

              I don’t have kids, I don’t have pets, the only person depending on my survival is me. If fascists come to take me, I’d rather go down and take them with me than go into the black hole (an entity from which nothing escapes) of a foreign prison/death camp.

              To assume one will merely be “detained” and given due process in the United States is, sadly, a naïve take in 2025.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Thus far these bozos have demonstrated a pattern of showing up without uniforms, with masks on, refusing to identify themselves, show badges, or produce warrants.

        This is needless to say an incredibly stupid thing for them to do, especially if they plan to also go around kicking in people’s doors. I personally know an old man who got off the hook for shooting a state cop in my area who tried the same. I think the only hope the Dummkstaffel here has of making a charge stick against a homeowner who blows one of them away will be to somehow make it Federal, because otherwise I think the state courts – especially in blue areas – are not going to treat any warrantless door-kicking by nonuniformed armed men who refuse to identify themselves very kindly.

        Edit to add: You’re also not protecting your “property” in such a case, you are protecting your person, which is a very different thing both legally and ethically. If the alternative is that you’re going to be whisked away without due process to a death camp in El Salvador, your only rational course of action is to stand and fight – especially in your own home.

        • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Also, the person may go to jail, but dead is dead. The person shot will be gone, and may make others be more cautious, as hopelessly goulish as that thought is. I hope that things calm down and the rule of law returns before things escalate that far. I don’t recognize the country right now.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            5 days ago

            Well, that’s pretty much how the entire crime and punishment system is supposed to work. Do the crime, get got for it, others hoping to do the same thing will hopefully think twice before doing so in the future.

            Therefore I think it’s completely fair that this script gets flipped on the fascists who are pretending to be “law” enforcement.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think the only hope the Dummkstaffel here has of making a charge stick against a homeowner who blows one of them away will be to somehow make it Federal

          It would be federal, because it would be a federal agent getting shot. Any murder of a federal officer–including postal carriers–is a federal crime, in addition to being a state crime. OTOH, remember that a large number of federal judges are not friendly to Herr Fuhrer.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes, and also aren’t hordes of these dipshits local cops that Trump is aiming to “deputize” to assist ICE? Those guys are not Federal agents no matter how hard they wish.

      • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        Well, the immigration official can sign the warrant themselves, so… still a warrant if I’m hearing right. But, a super fucked up warrant nonetheless.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 days ago

          Warrants from entities involved in enforcement aren’t warrants for the 4th amendment.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Doesn’t seem like it really matters if the courts rule against it. The judicial branch has no enforcement mechanism, and no one seems to be willing to escalate.

      • Necroscope0@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yes they do. The US Marshall service is considered the judicial armed police force. Though at the moment they enforce immigration as one of their functions they would be the ones to arrest federal cops for doing unconstitutional (illegal) shit in theory.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Unfortunately wrong. The marshals work for Pam Bondi at the DOJ. Still under the control of the executive.

  • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 days ago

    If a bunch of armed guys in masks show up refusing to identify themselves or provide warrants, what do you think most people would assume they are???

    In a country with more guns than people, this seems line an insanely stupid tactic that guarantees preventable tragedies.

    Warrants get rubber stamped on a regular basis, the argument that it’s suddenly too onerous a burden and they’re just allowed to ignore our constitutional rights is pretty fucking absurd too.

    • AlexLost@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s the rubber stamping that is the problem. Sometimes they get a talking to when they get too rambunctious and kill a few innocent bystanders. Now there’s no rules to bind them, so have at er!

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’shard to keep up with all the shit, but didn’t the supreme court rule they couldn’t use this act? Does a “DOJ memo” override a supreme court ruling?

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Once upon a time, German authorities decided to raid the home, or rather estate, of the local Hell’s Angel boss. Police (SEK) came up to the door in civilian clothes and balaclavas, announced themselves as police. Boss inside panics, thinks it’s a rival gang trying to take him out, grabs a shotgun, shoots a police through the door. Ultimately gets apprehended.

      Police file murder charges. State attorney downgrades that to manslaughter. Judge says “WTF that was self defence if police don’t want to get shot through the door they shouldn’t be running around ringing doorbells in civilian clothes and balaclavas anybody can shout ‘police open up!’”. Still got nailed for illegal possession of firearms on top of everything else he was wanted for, of course. Welcome to German law where you can legally stand your ground with a full auto but are not allowed to own one.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      The person who would that, if they are somehow still alive, will be crucified by the state.

  • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Enter my home without a warrant or identifying yourself, and your gonna leave in a casket.

    I’ve also explained to my family that we do not open the door to anyone, especially people who claim to be cops. Way too easy to claim it, then force their way in while your waiting for them to prove who they are.

    • Auzy@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think trump is a fwit, but sounds like there will be more than 1 bodybag leaving.

      Not a good survival strategy for your family honestly…

      Better off moving somewhere safe like Australia. No guns here. No idea why anyone would want to live in that shit hole anymore with all the corruption, shitty leaders, dangerous living environment, and uneducated idiots in charge

      • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The way I see it, if ICE is trying to come into my home without a warrant, then they already intend for me to die. I’m a white natural born US citizen, but I’ve made my stance on kings in this country pretty clear, so a visit from the SS is a factor I have to be ready for. I’d rather die at home, taking a many of them with me as I can, then quietly allowing them to send me to a death camp, if I had to choose.

        We don’t want to live here right now, but we don’t have the finances to leave. So instead, we’re going to protect our home, and continue to support and participate in the actions against tyranny that we can. Protests, pressure on other elected officials to resist as well, etc.

        Edit: Besides, if evil comes to your country and knocks at your door, shouldn’t you fight it?