A lot of people dislike it for the privacy nightmare that it is and feel the threat of an EEE attack. This will also probably not be the last time that a big corporation will insert itself in the Fediverse.

However, people also say that it will help get ActivityPub and the Fediverse go more mainstream and say that corporations don’t have that much influence on the Fediverse since people are in control of their own servers.

What a lot of posts have in common is that they want some kind of action to be taken, whether it’d be mass defederating from Threads, or accept them in some way that does not harm the Fediverse as much.

What actions can we take to deal with Threads?

  • luckystarr@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    In order to compete in user experience we need to up our game. We need to set up communities which collect, categorize and funnel user requests upstream. These features should be focused on:

    • reducing frictions like unclear UI, broken links, etc.
    • improving usability of the various web frontends (the one from Lemmy, kbin, etc.)
    • collecting bug reports and making sure they will be fixed

    This is meant to be a proxy between average users and tech enthusiasts who know how to do pull requests or open GitHub issues. Moderators of these communities would do it for them. This would enable us to gain visibility in the needs of the users.

    This is only a part of what needs to be done, but I think this can be done quickly.

    • float@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. If I want to see “VIPs”, influencers, ads or other crap like that I can still register an account over there. Also Meta’s track record is horrible…

      • emzaid@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not easy to make an account unless you port over your Instagram account. I attempted to make two separate accounts, and both were suspended instantly and I couldn’t continue unless I uploaded a selfie. But I didn’t really want to use my name ¯⁠\⁠(⁠◉⁠‿⁠◉⁠)⁠/⁠¯

        • float@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you say you don’t want to comply with their terms of service. That’s good for you 😄.

  • Renacles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think defederating is the only way forward, Facebook will take over otherwise even if they do it slowly.

  • notatoad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    we shouldn’t do anything.

    Isn’t the whole promise of the fediverse that whatever the policies of one instance are, that doesn’t necessarily affect all the other instances, and each can do their own thing. If an instance doesn’t want to accept traffic from threads, good for them. But to try to organize a fediverse-wide response to threads seems a whole lot like the centralization the fediverse is supposed to not be.

  • RyeBread@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What worries me most is how this has shown me how how wildly insecurely ActivityPub seems to be storing and sharing user data.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Absolutely defederate from threads immediately from anything threads related.

    Threads will collect any and all data they can about users disregarding which server you are on, and not agreeing to their business practices.

    There’s a reason they are not in the EU, including NI despite being in UK. And that’s probably because their practices are illegal, and don’t respect the rights of their users according to EU regulation.

    The second Lemmy federates with Threads, I’m out of here.

    • elvith@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fun fact - GDPR is about European persons, not European servers. If an European citizen has a fediverse account on an American/African/Asian/… server and Meta collects all of their data and processes it, they are still in violation of GDPR. Locking European (Instagram) accounts out of Threads doesn’t make them comply magically with GDPR.

      Good luck meta, have fun handling all those GDPR requests and proving that Europeans have consented that you suck up all their data…

        • elvith@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, that’s a bit of a problem in general. But in this case we’re talking about Meta. It’s one thing, if $randomCompany from outside the EU does it. As long as they’re not doing business within the EU and not specifically target the EU as a market, then they might try to get the company and fine them and may or may not succeed.

          Meta on the other hand provides service explicitly for EU citizens & companies. Not only did they localize Facebook, Instagram,… for European languages, they offer the service to sell ads for European companies. In this case, the EU can and will have a way to get them fined, I they want.

    • silver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i appreciate the message but what is that ui design???

      the floating hearts that go over the text. the neon pink background. the fact that this serious pact is in all lowercase (i know im typing in all lowercase, but i think the fedipact is different from an internet forum). the weird text animation for hyperlinks that makes it unreadable for a second. this does not lead to any reasonable credibility

      • macniel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is what nonconformity looks like. The internet of old looked similar to this. Nowadays, everything has ample whitespace, and is boringly styled, and ads everywhere.

        That would be how I look at this page.

        • schrodinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Webpages have ample whitespace and “boring” styling for accessibility and readability. Nonconformity for the sake of nonconformity is really stupid.

          • macniel@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean with boring that every website looks the same, perhaps a splash of color but thats it. And even that isn’t a guarantee for accessibility or readability. This pink website is perfectly valid and accessible.