• lowleveldata@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I genuinely can’t understand why words with alternate definitions linked to slavery might make people uncomfortable. It unintentionally reminds you bad things in history, and? Should we stop using words like “Nazi” or “War” too? Can we all stop using “death” while we’re at it? It reminds me the mortal nature of human

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because there are words that have less violent associations that can still capture the relationship sought to be described.

      [Stop using Nazi, war]

      Those aren’t used for computing though. And, yeah, I think if we did we probably should. Like if terms related to genocide were used for stopping a lot of processes at once that would be pretty weird to me.

      [death]

      Kill is used to refer to stopping processes and that’s probably where the line is in my opinion. It feels very different to me to say “kill a process” versus “genocide a group of processes”

      • lowleveldata@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We do use war. It’s a common package in Java. Should we rename that because it might make people uncomfortable when we say “We are going to deploy the war tomorrow”? Why can’t we just accept the fact that words have multiple meanings?