• rengoku2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How do they maintain morale for the remaining troops if they execute their own?

    And how would they recruite fresh ones if this will be the possible fate of the troops?

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do they maintain morale for the remaining troops if they execute their own?

      They don’t care about morale. They rule their troop with brutal means.

      And how would they recruite fresh ones if this will be the possible fate of the troops?

      Through forced conscription.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not defending Russia, but I believe most militaries have rules on the books saying that field executions for disobeying orders are a necessary part of war.

    So the big story here is that Russia is exercising those laws whereas most countries don’t, but on the other hand most countries don’t get involved in land wars in Eastern Europe either…

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not defending Russia, but I believe most militaries have rules on the books saying that field executions for disobeying orders are a necessary part of war.

      The last time western powers seriously used this was WW1. WW1 was quite famous and hated exactly because of the flippant use of executions of soldiers who weren’t willing or able to follow horrific orders. After that you’ll find a hard time to find examples. Especially after WW2. I certainly haven’t heard of a single US soldier for example who was executed in the field in Iraq or Afghanistan nor any death penalty even when found guilty of serious charges against them like Abu Ghraib.

      So yeah, no. Russia isn’t just doing what every other military is doing as well.