Sandbag@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIs moving to IPv6 worth it?message-squaremessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-squareIs moving to IPv6 worth it?Sandbag@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThe argument for IPv6 that there could be a unique address for 200 devices for every person living on the planet was much more compelling when network security was a more simple space.
minus-squareamki@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoNothing has changed about why that is compelling: NAT sucks and creates nothing but problems. Network security is almost the same with IPv6. If you rely on NAT as a security measure you are just very bad at networking.
The argument for IPv6 that there could be a unique address for 200 devices for every person living on the planet was much more compelling when network security was a more simple space.
Nothing has changed about why that is compelling: NAT sucks and creates nothing but problems.
Network security is almost the same with IPv6.
If you rely on NAT as a security measure you are just very bad at networking.