Protestation@discuss.tchncs.deB to Communism@lemmy.ml · 3 months agoProtestationdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageProtestationdiscuss.tchncs.deProtestation@discuss.tchncs.deB to Communism@lemmy.ml · 3 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squaredoylio@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoIt is not game theoretically aligned. It’s not his fault, Game Theory didn’t really get going until after his death
minus-squareCowbee [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoYes, Matpat will save Marxism. No, seriously, what problems does Marxism have, and how does Game Theory “solve” them or point them out?
minus-squarebremen15@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoMy main issue with it is that it is not evidence based but that the development of the target socially is speculative It’s incredibly hard to predict such development and Marx didn’t have the tools to do it properly.
Why?
It is not game theoretically aligned. It’s not his fault, Game Theory didn’t really get going until after his death
Yes, Matpat will save Marxism.
No, seriously, what problems does Marxism have, and how does Game Theory “solve” them or point them out?
My main issue with it is that it is not evidence based but that the development of the target socially is speculative It’s incredibly hard to predict such development and Marx didn’t have the tools to do it properly.