• hh93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    yeah but how much more is Uranium if it’s mined in Canada compared to the one from Niger or Russia?

    sure it’s not the main cost-driver but it’s not irrelevant either.

    Also: an installed solar-panel is very cheap in maintenance - and most of the running costs of are heavily influenced by inflation, too It just doesn’t make sense to push for building more atomic reactors - keeping the ones already there running IS making sense but building new ones that may start producing energy in 10 years AND are massively expensive is just not a reasonable investment

    • uint8_t@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      solar alone is never going to cover your needs. the moment you add the cost of battery storage, nuclear is definitely cheaper. yes, even new construction. for now. when the cost of batteries go down to 1/10th of what it’s today, this might change of course.