fuck these guys

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    No such thing tbh. None of the usual “extra phone number” services are any better.

    Curious what specific problem has you bailing though

    • pelletbucket@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      they’re fucking with my ability to text. friends I’ve been texting for years, my doctor, my outgoing messages are suddenly flagged as spam and support is being an asshole. Google support is always an asshole

      • ____@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        In years of using GV, group texts never worked correctly for me, and generally broke in unpredictable ways - some recipients would get some msgs, others would get other msgs, and others might just get dropped entirely. It was both weird and completely untenable for anything even remotely important.

        Yes, remotely important business does get conducted via group text once in a while - is it ideal, probably not, but I meet companies/individuals I work with where they are in the mutually easiest format. That only works if I can rely on the SMS solution in the first place, though.

      • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        For a limited period of time necessary to resolve your customer support issue, you agree to allow Google customer support to access data about and associated with your Google product and account, which may include product information such as IMEI, Serial Number, country in which your product was purchased, account history and limited historical usage data.

        The data accessed will be used to improve your customer service experience, to troubleshoot issues with this product, promotion history and for fraud prevention. Google will handle this data as described in Google’s https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en-US. Do we have your consent?

          • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s the copy and paste thing support posts or says every fucking times you try and talk to them. I guess the down voters think I’m pro this weird act they do to make it feel like you have control of your data.

    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, Gmail isn’t necessarily a bad email service. Most people on here probably just want to avoid giving Google more data about them. Whether other VoIP Providers are better on privacy - ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s irrelevant.

        None of the other options do what Google voice does. There’s no direct equivalent. Not that I’ve ever run across, and I’ve looked.

        Jmp is the closest, and it still doesn’t have feature parity all the way.

        • ____@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          As far as function, they’ve got a nice little package all wrapped up and easy to use. Aside from the group text thing I mentioned elsewhere, it’s a pretty slick implementation. But for a user base of one, with privacy concerns, I’d rather use something that’s a bit rougher around the edges yet more configurable, and more private.

      • ____@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        From where I sit, it’s a pretty decent email service from both user-side and admin-side, including for biz use in nearly any size org.

        It’s all about the data, and not wanting to be the product for me - I have no direct beef with their implementation or abstractions of admin-side details. I just would rather pay a relatively small amount of money than pay with my data.