• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think the point is that if one side is correct and the other side is incorrect (regardless of which side that is) then someone with that point of view cannot possibly be centralist.

    To be centralist you would have to conceive the both sides have a point. Centralists like to claim that they listen to both sides and then make an opinion on who to support, but they don’t, they just stick around in the middle. They never actually commit to one side or the other, because if they did that they wouldn’t be centralist anymore and they wouldn’t be able to be on their high horse.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Except life isn’t black and white and rarely is one side “wrong” and the other side “right”.

      Committing to “the truth” is simplifying a grey universe which contains millions of those truths. You can’t be certain which is right and which is wrong.

      • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Committing to “the truth” is simplifying a grey universe which contains millions of those truths. You can’t be certain which is right and which is wrong.

        There are a lot of grey areas, but racism and fashism is just wrong, there is nothing grey about it. Trump either won the election or he didn’t, one is a truth and the other is a lie, there cannot be two truths. You are either pregnant or not. You are alive or dead. Just because there are grey areas does not mean that every area is grey. If you have to construct grey areas to avoid committing to the truth, then you are on the side of the lie.

        And if you know exactly where the truth is, and you still vote for the lie, then you are in bed with the liar and getting his flies.