• Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Haha I remember the days of downloading random EXEs off the internet and running them to see what they do (also the days of CD-rom drives).

    My auntie somehow managed to get a virus that played Für Elise through the motherboard speaker and never stopped so long as the thing was on. I don’t think they ever solved it, in the end they just got a new PC.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Literally why would someone make that. That is completely indistinguishable as a signal.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean I guess you are supposed to take it to your computer repair shop and tell them it won’t stop playing Für Elise, and the shop is supposed to recognise it as a failure of CPU fan signal. If it just beeped a few times on startup then people would ignore it, and if it beeped constantly then well maybe Für Elise is nicer.

          • Kairos@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Huh yeah that’s MUCH better than throwing a post code and playing a beep during startup to signal something is wrong.

              • Kairos@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Hm. Well if the motherboard can play a song it can blast “<Type> Error” during startup to be infinitely more helpful.

                • Dave@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I don’t think those speakers are capable of voice. They can handle a few different beep tones and that’s about it. The song was not like listening to Spotify, it was played using beep tones.

                  • thejml@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I had an Athlon motherboard with voice POST messages… one night I woke up to it saying “your CPU has a problem!” over and over and was freaked out until I was completely awake and figure out what was wrong.

                    It wasn’t high quality coming through the piezo speaker, but it was good enough.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Computers in 97 didn’t need much in the way of cooling. A large passive heatsink was plenty for those CPUs. They’re not the 300+ watt behemoths we have today.

          • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I really remember heatsinks being a thing on overclocked systems around that time frame and then once we got to P4 cpus the chilling towers appeared those things were massive

            • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The lower power 486s didn’t even need a heatsink. The P3 was the first to take a heasink resembling what we have today, but damn did the P4s need some serious cooling.

              It’s kinda funny how we think the 100 watts of a desktop P4 was insane when now the TDP of a high end laptop CPU is more than that.

              • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s kinda funny how we think the 100 watts of a desktop P4 was insane when now the TDP of a high end laptop CPU is more than that.

                It really isn’t. Modern mobile cpus barely sip power.

                • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  If you meant cell phones and tablets, that’s mostly due to the different architecture. RISC processors are super energy efficient, which also makes them much cooler to run.

                  x86-64 is a CISC architecture, which tends to be much more power hungry. There are only a couple of very low power Celeron CPUs that work under 10W of TDP, while that’s very common among phones’ CPUs.

                  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    x86-64 is a CISC architecture

                    In many cases it’s actually RISC under the hood and uses an interpreter to translate the CISC commands and run them in the most optimal manner on the silicon

                    ARM and RISC-V absolutely scale up to multi-hundred watt server CPUs quite easily. Just look at the Ampere systems you can rent from various VPSes for example

                    The big benefit that ARM and RISC-V have is they have no established backwards compatibility to keep carrying technical debt forwards. ARM versions their instruction sets and software has to be released for given versions of ARM cores, and RISC-V is simply too new to have any significant technical debt on the instruction set side.

                    Atom cores were notable for focusing the architecture on some instructions then other instructions would be a slog to execute, so they were really good at certain things and for desktop use (especially in the extremely budget machines they got shoved into) they were painful. Much like how eCores are now. They’re very carefully architected for power efficiency, and do their jobs extremely well, but an all eCore CPU is a slog for desktop use in many cases

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Drain.exe would say “water in drive a:, commencing spin cycle” then power up the drive and make a gurgling sound.

      Sheep.exe … would create a sheep that would wander the desktop.

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Haha, in highschool I put sheep.exes into the school labs startup folders as a prank once. A couple days later the tech teacher approached me and was like “nobody’s in trouble but these things are a nightmare and if I have to reimage half the lab to get rid of them it would personally ruin my day”. Somehow all the sheep were gone by the next day