• Tocano@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is unfortunate that some countries are using cameras, microphones and others to control the behaviour of people. I agree that it is a required measure - as some people do not change their behaviours out of good will - but it is definitely not ideal.

    Hopefully, in some years it will no longer be necessary, as people will have those good behaviours deeply rooted.

    • Duxon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You forgot that there will always be young men succumbing to testosterone.

    • aggelalex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cameras with microphones. Once a loud vehicle is detected the license plate has to be photographed.

      • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Great, for added big brother points, the government could literally listen to every conversation on every street corner…

        Edit. Perhaps someone could enlighten me as to why the police having live recording microphones everywhere is a good idea, generally you’d need a warrant to record citizens.

        But sure, this is just for loud exhausts and has no other possible uses. Lol!

        I always ask myself with these sorts of things, what would the CCP do?

        China’s ambition to collect a staggering amount of personal data from everyday citizens is more expansive than previously known, a Times investigation has found. Phone-tracking devices are now everywhere. The police are creating some of the largest DNA databases in the world. And the authorities are building upon facial recognition technology to collect voice prints from the general public.

        https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/21/world/asia/china-surveillance-investigation.html

        I don’t think it’s wise to install potential dual use surveillance tech that a future government/leader could use

        • Mad_Punda.de@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This can be done without constantly recording or transmitting what the microphone perceives. It can simply start recording sound and picture when a noise is detected that is loud enough / matches the pattern we’re looking for. This can be done just on the device. No big brother tech needed.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you been sleeping under a rock for the last 15 years? If the government wants to listen to you, they’ll just use the microphone in your pocket. Or better: they don’t listen to your incoherent ramblings and go straight for your search history, which is much more interesting than what you are generally talking about.

          • giantofthenorth@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know if you know this, but it’s pretty easy for someone to make private their phone, search history, etc. You just need to be a little dedicated and sacrifice some usability.

            You cannot do the same with microphones listening everywhere that you do not own.

            Have some sense.

              • giantofthenorth@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Unless there’s something beyond switching DNS, using a VPN and your own router/modem. It’s maybe 100$ up front and ~3-5 per month to be able to circumvent any telecom.

                • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You mean the VPN advertising everywhere, who gives out the user data whenever a goverment agency knocks on the door? Or the other big name VPN, where the company owner has another business that makes money by selling users internet data?

                  Yeah, i’m sure they will bend over backwards and file lawsuits to “protect your privacy” for $5/month…

                • Square Singer@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Switching DNS does jack squat for your privacy. Any telecom worth their salt can read all DNS requests no matter which DNS you talk to. They only don’t filter content on alternative DNSes because they don’t care about filtering/blocking in general unless forced to by law.

                  Using a VPN doesn’t add privacy, it just swapps out who is monitoring your traffic. Many VPN services are actually owned/run by secret services or cooperate with them (like NordVPN). Others are directly run by criminals who use them to steal data or inject malware. Also, VPN providers also have ISPs that reside in countries. In the very best case it’s not your ISP spying on you, but the VPN’s ISP. In the worst case, you now have an ISP and a VPN provider spying on you.

                  Your own router/modem again does nothing at all for your privacy.

                  That’s what I mean: people think they are doing privacy enhancing things, but actually what they are doing isn’t helping at all.

  • Nils@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great to see! I really hope more cities will follow suit to deal with this problem as well.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wish we had that here. I could only afford a home on a busy street and the pollution is bad enough we it is without the modded trucks, muscle cars and motorcycle racing by at 1am. It’s illegal, but uninforced.

    And that crying about being spied on… we already have cameras everywhere, actually having them used for something we want would be lovely. This and carpool lane enforcement, regulated in a way that can’t be abused (unlike red light and stop sign cameras, which local governments really abuse given lack of top down regulation).

    • Majikthise@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hear that the UK is trialling them in England an Wales, and London also had a trial run in 2021/22. Not sure what came of it, though.
      Trouble is, the UK has no law limiting the noise a car can make. Only if there is e.g. a modified exhaust can the police even do something.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe next they can introduce these in Sweden, to deal with the eurodanceraggare and loud-tailpipe dickheads that plague the roads.

  • giantofthenorth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone celebrating this is a fool.

    This will lead to more spying on you, gives police even more power, and offers you only less noise for how many cars?

    Trees, greenery and better housing design might solve the issue or make it not bad.

    Self reporting, followed by an inspection to verify the car’s sound could solve this issue.

    But more surveillance for another ones of the world surveillance states is so fucking stupid.

    • Duxon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For me, it’s worth it. I live next to a forest already, far outside the city center, and there’s still assholes racing at night at the nearby street because it’s quite secluded and straight.

      Also, I’m not worried about microphones on busy streets. It’s a public space already, which affects the content of my speech already. Microphones at home should be much more important for anyone worried about privacy.

  • noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A couple hundred meters away from me, there’s a piece of a two-lane two-lane road that has no traffic lights for a little over 1 km and has the priority of way, too - meaning that at night, you can get a somewhat high speed over there for a little while without leaving the city limits.

    There’s only a few bikers in my city, but holy shit do they make “good” use of the opportunity in summer. I really wish we also had this kind of cameras out there, because the noise from just one is insane, especially at dead of night, and sometimes they do this in packs.

    The best part is that it never lasts once - they just speed between the two traffic lights for a while, making a shit ton of that noise.

    There are also buildings with windows overlooking that same road from a much closer distance than mine. Can’t really imagine what it’s like for people living there, even though we’re basically meters away from each other.