Dog meat consumption, a centuries-old practice on the Korean Peninsula, isn’t explicitly prohibited or legalized in South Korea

  • FlowVoid@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People do kill feral dogs and cats. Even PETA does this. Morally, they should be eaten afterwards.

    A wild fish can kill other animals every day. Cats do kill a lot of birds, but not quite at the same rate since they can also subsist by scavenging.

    So while it’s moral to kill and eat feral cats, wild fish are preferred. Even if you have to pay someone to catch them.

    • Vegoon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you are all the way vegan but jump from time to time in a lake and grab some fish? Is this how you imagine the world will progress?

      • FlowVoid@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t need to jump in a lake for the same reason I don’t need to operate a farm. It is equally moral if others do it for me, so I buy wild fish and vegetables from my grocery just like most people.

        Also, pure veganism isn’t necessary. For example, honey is not vegan but producing honey likely kills fewer animals than producing almonds. Beekeeping might even be a net positive given the benefits to the ecosystem at large

        • Vegoon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, so you only eat the not farmed grocery shop fish and besides that you live vegan from the farmed grocery vegetables?

          • FlowVoid@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think that is the best way to avoid unnecessary animal deaths (honey is also on that list).

            It is something I often consider when shopping, but I don’t always try to minimize unnecessary animal deaths. Just as I generally try to avoid big box stores and products made in certain countries, but sometimes buy those things anyway.

            Why do I make exceptions? Because I don’t believe that every single thing I do needs to be aimed at improving the world. It is simply an aspiration.

            • Vegoon@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe you would more of a impact on others if you decide to stop support the killing. I do shitpost sometimes, it be like that. But I also try to inform others. The point is not that you will change the world alone, but maybe convince others. If avoiding unnecessary deaths is your aspiration you can be a example to others.

              • FlowVoid@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What makes you think I’m shitposting?

                I am perfectly serious when I say that I believe veganism is incompatible with the stated goal of reducing animal deaths.

                And I am serious when I say that I have increased my intake of wild fish to support that goal, even though it is not my only goal.

                To me, the unspoken goal of veganism is to protect appealing animals at the expense of unappealing animals. That is why they show pictures of farmed cows, but not flooded rice fields. I can’t ever get behind that goal.

                • Vegoon@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If there is some event that puts us all back to pre industrial times it will work.

                  A plant based diet would feed with the amount we grow 10 billion right now. How many would a forage and hunting society sustain? To give you a idea of the proportions: https://xkcd.com/1338/

                  • FlowVoid@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not sure why you linked me to a chart of mammals. Hunting mammals may be a good way to feed a small population, but as you point out it’s not feasible for the entire world.

                    Three fourths of all animal biomass is aquatic (fish, crustaceans, and mollusks), together accounting for 30-40 times more biomass than humans. Mollusks are the smallest component, but they still have more biomass than all the mammals in your link put together. Fish by themselves account for seven times as much biomass as all animal livestock put together. And crustaceans have even more combined biomass than fish.

                    I’m not even suggesting that people eat only fish. Rather, by including some fish in our diet we would reduce our reliance on farm-grown vegetables.

                    Globally, humans currently eat an average of 20 kg of fish/crustaceans/molluscs per year. That might be a bit too much, but I have no doubt that we could sustainably eat 10-15 kg per year.