• Manucode@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t buy this. According to the label, only the minimum legal standards for animal welfare were observed.

      • gerryflap@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah because everything in the world is binary and there can’t ever be nuance.

        I’m reducing my meat intake, but I do still eat meat every now and then. When I do, I tend to consider the impact on animal welfare and the environment. Eating meat from an animal that has lived relatively free and happy life is a lot better to me than one that has been locked inside for most of it’s life.

        • Mkengine@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Meat intake reduction is my main target as well as the meanings of the labels have not as big an impact one would hope for, but at least it’s not a complete scam. I have to make sure I eat a balanced diet anyway because otherwise I get intestinal problems, so it’s best for me to eat vegetarian or vegan more often.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nooo don’t call me out on my virtue signaling!!11!! I loooove animals 🥰🥰🥰 I also pay for them to be gassed and stabbed in the neck. Yum 😋😋😋

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          If the options are treating them shit before killing them or treating them better before killing, I think treating them better is still, well, better, even though the end result is that they’re killed.