• sergih@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    can they ban you for wearing a necklace with a cross? or a scarf around your head? This is madness, what bad does it do to other people, this is like banning lgbtq people from kissing outside cause it makes others uncomfortable.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No they can not ban you, but they can ban your cross.

      If you can’t live without your cross, that is on you.

      • sergih@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        thing is most peoplenIknoew, when they wear a cross or smt, it’s not even a big deal for them, theyre just just wearing, doesn’t mean they are going to siddenly start talking to you about religion.

    • RedPandaRaider@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t about banning people from wearing their religious merchandise in public. This is banning religious objects from workplaces. More precisely just public workplaces. Of course a secular state should also have secular workplaces. And the way labour rights are personal life can be completely banned from your workplace. Why would religion be treated differently?

      • branchial@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is that the workplace you want? Devoid of personal lives but mere drones who congregate to labour and then disperse into their personal lives where finally they are free to express themselves how they want?

          • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think it gets pretty hypocritical, singling out religion like that. In the workplace, I can have memorabilia of my favorite sports team even though someone else hates it (unless perhaps it’s a Catholic School team that has a cross in its logo?). I can have the flag of a hostile foreign country because I’m proud of my heritige. I can have a picture of me kissing my wife even though it would normally be just outside the common no-tolerance Harassment policy. Unless it was taken at the wedding, or in/near a religious monument. I can wear gauge earrings, or just a little star… as long as it’s not a Star of David. Ditto with pendants, even new-agey wooowooo pendants, as long as it’s not a pentagram. There’s no path there that isn’t hypocritical.

            Freedom of religion and freedom from religion go hand-in-hand, and it’s not always an easy relationship to figure out. Forced private secularism is its own anti-freedom problem, even when discussing the employee at a government workplace. It’s not really secular if I’m forbidden from wearing something for solely religious reasons. Even if the religious reason is that the thing I want to wear is religious.

            • RedPandaRaider@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’d say there is a difference between politics and regular hobbies at the workplace. Religion is a very political issue, one about your worldview and beliefs.

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shit tier take, with no nuance and a dashing of embedded prejudice.

      what bad does it do to other people

      Religion is a cancer, the quicker we kill it, the better society will be. In other words, religion does a lot of bad by being propagated.

      • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shit tier take, with no nuance and a dashing of embedded prejudice.

        Religion is a cancer, the quicker we kill it, the better society will be.

        Bruuh. I am not saying you are wrong, but you are criticizising what you are doing yourself by a much stronger margin.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Athiesm is a cancer, the quicker we kill it, the better society will be. In other words, Athiesm does a lot of bad by being propagated.

        Listen to yourself. You’re no better than an Islamic terrorist wanting to slaughter infidels.

        • taladar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You need to learn to distinguish between belief and people holding that belief, but maybe you are getting that wrong on purpose.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No. I’m thinking logically. The only way to kill the belief would be to kill the people who hold it.

            • taladar@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Have you heard of the concept of changing your mind or even changing your world view? Or even just the concept of preventing the people who currently hold the belief from passing it on to the next generation?

                • taladar@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Sure, give me some evidence that the world doesn’t work the way I think it does and I can change it.