• IMongoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t mean to sound like a Monsanto shill, but farmers are not forced to use those seeds. They could use their own seeds if they wanted. But the GMO crops are so much more efficient that they are worth the cost.

    • 342345@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      My knowledge stems from just my memory of one or two documentations I watched. But there they stated that the gmo advantage is just a marketing lie in the long run, because nature adapts and yields decrease and herbicide/ fungicide usage increases.

      Is there a study that shows that gmo performs better (yield wise, impact on the fauna, toxicity) than all other approaches?

        • 342345@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Thanks. That’s interesting. The outcome looks positive regarding the yield sold/ha and spray of pesticides.

          I wasn’t able to find the duration of the study and an answer to the question: Are the improved yields/ reduced pesticide results stable over multiple years (1/5/10 years after the switch to Bt brinjal)? I searched for year and duration in the text and wasn’t able to find it. But I’m at my mobile phone atm. 😒