Hey fellow Linux enthusiasts! I’m curious to know if any of you use a less popular, obscure or exotic Linux distribution. What motivated you to choose that distribution over the more mainstream ones? I’d love to hear about your experiences and any unique features or benefits that drew you to your chosen distribution.

  • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
    0·
    1 year ago

    Fedora Silverblue

    I use Fedora Silverblue, I don’t know if that (still) counts as “underground”-distro.

    Reason I switched: I’ve been distrohopping/ desktophopping for the whole time I used Linux (~2-3 years) and always came back to Fedora. I really like it’s sane (for me) defaults.

    Problem: I broke pretty much any system I installed after a few weeks.
    Knowing enough to change everything, but doing exactly that without knowing exactly what I do and how to fix stuff is really bad.
    Instead of fixing a problem, I just reinstalled. That took me just an hour everytime, but still is a bad practice, even when it’s quicker.

    Also, everytime I was happy with Gnome, KDE got a shiny new feature I just wanted to have, and I switched the Fedora spin, since switching DE on a used system feels really dirty and buggy.

    The last time I broke my (Tumbleweed) install without actually doing anything I just said “Fuck it, even if I loose some freedom, I will now only use immutable systems from now on!”.

    I decided for Fedora, and oh boy…

    Actually, I didn’t loose much freedom or functionality at all!

    (Only exception: no VPN app, I have to use the menu from Gnome; and somehow, Boxes doesn’t work atm, maybe that’s just a bug).

    I’m now using it for 2 months and couldn’t be happier!!! Why?

    • Atomic updates + super quick and easy rollback support (already saved my butt) by rebooting and selecting another image.
    • Clear separation between “my” stuff and the OS, which is really intuitive.
    • Feels clean.
    • I can rebase anytime I want (switch to KDE, a WM, and so on) with one command and no residual data or bugs.
    • Self maintaining with automatic updates in the background.
    • Unlimited software: not an advantage of SB, but you have to use distrobox sometimes, and I would never discovered that tool without!
    • AND, a project called uBlue . You can create or download custom images, like a SteamOS/ Nobara-clone, Vanilla with QOL-changes, almost all DEs (e.g. XFCE, which is unsupported by default), and so on.

    I’m really in love with Silverblue, everybody should check it out!

    • lily33@lemm.ee
      0·
      1 year ago

      I use NixOS for very similar reasons. And also, because I like my full configuration in one place.

      • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
        0·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I fully get why people like Nix.

        I fully respect it when people want a “next-gen-Arch” with the DIY-aspect of building their own OS. At least, that’s my impression on it.

        For me personally, it sounds like too much work. I’m not advanced enough and want something hassle free that “just works”.

        But especially for professional developers (reproducibility) and Linux enthusiasts, it sounds like a dream!