• Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    And having separate categories solves that how? You’re just perpetuating the very thing you’re declaring is a problem.

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The current system is less than ideal, but at least with gendered awards, women have a shot at getting awards which translates into bigger future paychecks. What you’re proposing is that the same industry that currently ignores equal pay for women is somehow going to recognize them in a category against the men who are already getting paid more than them?!

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This doesn’t solve equal pay, it just perpetuates the misogynist notion that women aren’t good enough to compete with men.

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a bad guess.

        • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          And having separate categories solves that how? You’re just perpetuating the very thing you’re declaring is a problem.

          • Ulrich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Is there a reason you’re quoting the comments I wrote back to me?

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Strange that you don’t understand the implications of your own words. Replace gender with race. That should help you understand some of those implications.

              • Ulrich
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                There are no implications that you aren’t cryptically fabricating in your head.

                • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  I’m sure I am also fabricating those up votes too. Is it really that hard to apply your own principle to a different situation or are you pretending to be obtuse?

                  • Ulrich
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    22 hours ago

                    If you’re ignorant enough to think that up/downvotes mean anything at all then I shouldn’t be surprised that you’re unable to comprehend the nuance of this discussion and instead choose to argue by completely and intentionally misrepresenting my statements. You can go away now.