• RidderSport
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    That honestly is a very interesting subject for a beginners exam to criminal law

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      unless they’re parked right next to your roses, I imagine it would be pretty easy to prove malice

      • Krzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        But could it not be reasonably assumed that you were only attempting to annoy the owner and not cause harm?

        No idea if that even makes a difference, would be funny tho

          • RidderSport
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Thats were it gets tricky in reality. But not necessarily in an exam that prioritises theoretical criminal knowledge

        • RidderSport
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Annoying some is thankfully not a criminal action.

      • RidderSport
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes prove intent, but depending on the legal system that might not be enough. Say I believe that spraying someone with sparkling water on the beach would kill you, that does not necessarily mean you attempted to take someones life. Similarly hurting someone in sports does not mean you assaulted them in a criminal sense.