abhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 days agoPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square136linkfedilinkarrow-up1215arrow-down124cross-posted to: python@programming.devlobsters@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comabhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square136linkfedilinkcross-posted to: python@programming.devlobsters@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzechlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·22 days agoThat woulb be 0.5x. −2x implies negative duration, which makes no sense. Neither does the layout of anything else in the image.
That woulb be 0.5x. −2x implies negative duration, which makes no sense. Neither does the layout of anything else in the image.