GNOME announced an interim director of Richard Littauer, who joined last week.

Holly’s resignation appears to be personal, as she intends to pursue a PhD in Psychology.

  • TeryVeneno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Tbf though the results speak for themselves though, GNOME has definitely been thriving under her though much of that is also do to the effort of others. She did put in a lot of work and no one inside GNOME complained so I assume it was a good deal. Also the page you linked shows she’s been working in executive positions in non profits for a while so definitely qualified.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      She lasted slightly longer than a head of lettuce. I don’t think she’ll be the reason Gnome Foundation lives or dies.

      • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        She lasted slightly longer than a head of lettuce

        That must be one plucky lettuce head considering that holly has been the director for nearly a year.

        Gnome foundation will continue to thrive with and without her but she has made some decent contributions while she was there

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also the page you linked shows she’s been working in executive positions in non profits for a while so definitely qualified.

      That’s certainly something to bear in mind, but as someone who worked in academia, resume ≠ qualified. Especially at the Director+ levels, unqualified people get to become provosts and presidents all the time.

      She may be qualified on paper, but given the fact that she voluntarily left after only 10mo, it speaks to the fact that she’s likely a flake and very self-interested. Gnome may have thrived, but it remains to be seen if that was because of or in spite of her; perhaps she was so hands-off that everybody else just ran things the way they needed to be run.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah. I do find her “shamanism” to be something to eyeroll at, but her actual work experience shows her running multiple non-profits, and by all accounts she did a decent job at Gnome.

      Clearly her shamanism BS didn’t actually affect her ability to work at Gnome or the other places she’s worked.

      You can be an absolute moron/a crazy person in some areas, whilst simultaneously being qualified to do some difficult jobs.

      Steve Jobs thought a fruit diet would cure pancreatic cancer, but he still had the chops to run Apple. A certain GNU figure that the Linux community loves has some, uh, unusual views on whether children can consent to sex or not, but he was still a great programmer and advocate for FOSS. I have a friend who thought Manchester, not London, was the capital of England, yet he works as an aeronautical engineer (and not for Boeing lol) in a senior design position.