• Lumidaub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The US annexing Greenland is all it would take? How so? I’m asking because I’m woefully undereducated in these matters. Couldn’t we form our own NATO, without the US but with blackjack and universal health care?

    • superkret
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Greenland belongs to Denmark. Denmark doesn’t want to give it up. So annexing it would constitute an attack of one NATO member on another.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Exactly. Also, Europe can and likely will start its own defensive alliance sooner or later. But with the US constituting more than half the military power of NATO right now, that won’t amount to much other than keeping the Russians in check.

        • Lumidaub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Ah, so the issue is that NATO, in order to be effective, is very much dependent on the US being in it. Bother.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Not really, NATO is a nuclear power and a several times bigger conventional military power than Russia, even without the US.

            That said, it would be shit fighting against the US. For everyone involved.