• superkret
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    one + is enough actually, unless you’re making fun of the concept of inclusion.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The silly part is that the abbreviation keeps growing longer and more cryptic each time I look somewhere else. Can’t keep up with all the things that are a sexual orientation now.

      That is not to say those people shouldn’t have the right to be and live however they wish to be, just that I can’t be bothered to keep track of the lingo.

      • azulavoir@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s the idea behind the + - anyone trying to put more things “up front” is really just distracting from the point that we’re all in this building together

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This may sound radical, but listing every gender and sexual minority is more than a simple acronym can realistically handle.