His threat was directed at countries in the so-called BRIC alliance, which consists of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    I didn’t say prices wouldn’t go up. Byt I don’t think someone like him worries or cares about how much people will have to pay to replace their washing machines. Do you think he cares about that?

    • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      No of course he doesn’t care as it doesn’t affect him. He is rich and don’t give a single fuck about anyone but himself. The whole giving him a chance to negotiate is also BS. China and other countries will never pay these tarrifs and therefore it will be more expensive because the cost will be higher for the end consumer

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        The do pay if their are products of the same type, eg. one is Chinese with the tarrifs priced in, the other from a country without that tariff on it. Consumers will choose the cheaper option over the Chinese tarrifed version (resulting in less sales).

        Producers in china then report lower sales in the American market, putting pressure on their government.

        So although the cost is theoretically paid by consumers it is still a form of pressure (depressed sales) on the producer. That’s what I meant in seeing it as a possible negotiating tool.

        The left/right political narrative is elsewhere though, not in a place that is about investigating these angles of understanding. That’s okay. I accept that.

        • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          That’s not how it works. Other products will also become more exspensive as a result. The competitors will not hold back on the prices.

          • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            That’s a different topic with various factors involved… But generally pricing someone out can keep a competitor off shelves. Most companies want to secure marketshare.

            This is not the same as what happened during covid, which effected the whole of the domestic market at once. Obviously tariffs on specific importants is a different effect than that.

            • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              No, that’s the point. Both the less exspensive and the exspensive products will go up in price because of this. Just look at what happened with washing machines under Trumps first period. They went way up in price and drying machines did also go up in price. This will happen to most products in general if these tolls will be implemented. China will never pay for these tarrifs and the consumers will be the ones that has to.

              • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                China pays in the form of making less sales/exports.

                …and no, prices of Cars can’t be blamed on tariffs on washing machines. Nor can market rules be derived from “what happened under Trump”. COVID global supply shortages also happened under Trump.