itsnicodegallo@lemm.ee to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1397arrow-down111
arrow-up1386arrow-down1imageThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeitsnicodegallo@lemm.ee to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squareFleetingTitlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down4·24 hours agoBoth sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
minus-squarechonglibloodsport@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·21 hours agoWho said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoJust keep these fellas out of it:
minus-squarechonglibloodsport@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoThey’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
minus-squareShareMySims@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·edit-222 hours agoIn the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
minus-squareFleetingTitlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·22 hours agoIf you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
minus-squarePumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·16 hours agoColloquial “sexism” is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
minus-squareelidoz@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·22 hours agoovaries are just nuts in the inside
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoI Snickers at this comment.
minus-squareShareMySims@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down5·edit-221 hours agoAnd if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/ https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoyo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥
Both sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
Who said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
Just keep these fellas out of it:
They’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
Yes.
In the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
If you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
Colloquial “sexism” is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
ovaries are just nuts in the inside
I Snickers at this comment.
And if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid
https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/
https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
yo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥