I made my assertion with evidence (laws to punish abortions on the books) which you disregarded by saying no one has been charged (YET) so there was nothing to worry about. Then why will you not provide evidence (that we haven’t already discussed and disproved) to back up your claims?
And again, as it’s worded it’s too fucking vague for people to gamble on. So no it’s no untrue. The threat is real because it’s in the books. Just because it hasn’t come to pass doesn’t mean it’s not a threat. I do believe murder is wrong. Never said it wasn’t. Abortion isn’t murder.
Removed by mod
No it’s not irrelevant. If it was the laws should be removed. As it stands they exist and are therefore pertinent.
A fetus is a fetus, until it is a child it is a lump of cells and therefore no one should be forced to carry a fetus. It is not murder.
Removed by mod
It’s relevant because it is. And now you’ve moved onto strawman fallacies. Try to argue in good faith :)
Removed by mod
I made my assertion with evidence (laws to punish abortions on the books) which you disregarded by saying no one has been charged (YET) so there was nothing to worry about. Then why will you not provide evidence (that we haven’t already discussed and disproved) to back up your claims?
Removed by mod
And again, as it’s worded it’s too fucking vague for people to gamble on. So no it’s no untrue. The threat is real because it’s in the books. Just because it hasn’t come to pass doesn’t mean it’s not a threat. I do believe murder is wrong. Never said it wasn’t. Abortion isn’t murder.
Removed by mod