• Laser
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean… The general point still stands. It’s not that western nations seriously doubt that Russia has these weapons. We know Russia has ICBMs, we know they have nukes, we know they’re willing to attack Ukraine with conventional weapons.

      What Western nations doubt is that Russia would actually attack them or use nukes, because it’d trigger a united response they’d lose against, and they know that and want to avoid it.

      It’s not about capabilities, but willingness.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, but a central tenet of nuclear deterrence is that you don’t constantly posture your own position with nuclear armaments. If you keep saying if you cross this red line we’ll go nuclear, and then don’t … It makes future threats pretty laughable.

        International nuclear relations have already been gamed out. It’s always a last case scenario, because everyone has a sense of self preservation, especially the narcissistic types that like to be in charge of countries.

        No one wants to live in a nuclear wasteland, so no one is going to create a nuclear wasteland unless they feel that they themselves are in immediate existential danger, and even then it would be an action made in spite.

        • Laser
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          This is part of the point I was trying to make