• Viri4thus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    “In short, it appears that the “more human than human” phenomenon in poetry is caused by a misinterpretation of readers’ own preferences. Non-expert poetry readers expect to like human-authored poems more than they like AI-generated poems. But in fact, they find the AI-generated poems easier to interpret; they can more easily understand images, themes, and emotions in the AI-generated poetry than they can in the more complex poetry of human poets.”

    AI writes poems for dummies and dummies like it. Fin

    Otherwise, purposefully chosing less popular poems also biases the study towards poems of lower appeal from the human poets.

    • logos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also, it only works when there’s a human weeding out all but the “best” poems.

      …when a human chooses the best AI-generated poem (“human-in-the-loop”) participants cannot distinguish AI-generated poems from human-written poems, but when an AI-generated poem is chosen at random (“human-out-of-the-loop”), participants are able to distinguish AI-generated from human-written poems.