• ChaoticNeutralCzech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    The Belgians made so much money from slave-harvested rubber that they indeed built decent highways and other infrastructure. Of course, those weren’t for the indigenous population, only motor vehicles could use them. After the revolution, the nation had no finance, expertise and stability to maintain them.

    • ladicius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The Belgians tortured and killed for profit in such horrendous numbers that even their allies were very uncomfortable.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        16 minutes ago

        Yup, Leopold II was just insanely evil. He had illiterate tribal chiefs unknowingly sign their land away, and to avoid slavery accusations, the Leopold-led “Congo Free State’s” people only labored unwillingly to “pay their taxes”. To prevent the mostly indigenous patrols from revolting, their ammo was only replenished if they returned the right hand of a victim per bullet. They were underfed and needed to hunt, obtaining extra bullets by maiming innocent people. However, Leopold II was very good at managing PR, basically a trailblazer for modern politicians and CEOs, so few people understood the conditions the rubber was harvested under and he avoided consequences for policies that killed millions. Just as Congo gained independence, Belgium started a civil war to try to wrestle power back. The CIA also destabilized the region by various operations including assassinations.

        A very good 3-part episode from Behind the Bastards podcast series on Congo: 1 2 3