• Peter_Arbeitslos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Don’t get me wrong. Of course send everything we have to them, Taurus, F-16, billions of dollars. Damn, hit Putin in his Kreml with drones. We should have sent the equipment way earlier when they said they would need it and not months later. (Fuck you, Olaf Scholz.) If we would have done it earlier, we now wouldn’t talk about how to Ukraine needs more soldiers. Still send the weapons anyway. But now we talk about the need for soldiers and we can’t ignore it when Ukraine simply doesn’t have enough soldiers to handle all their weapons and fight back the Russian army on some parts of the front. And that they need more soldiers and have to mobilize is what have I heard a few times in the last weeks.

    • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Okay, and what are “we” (as in Ukraines western partners) to do about this? We cannot send ukrainian refugees back with a gun and a helmet. We cannot wololo russian soldiers into ukrainian ones. We cannot conjure up soldiers magically. What we can do is send weapons, ammunitions, medical supplies etc. We can enforce sanctions against Russia and its oligarchy making it least profitable and discouraging to fight this war.
      Or do you want to send troops?

      • Peter_Arbeitslos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Never said we could do anything about that directly (maybe indirectly by sending money). I just said we shouldn’t ignore the problem and downvote the post.