I believe you have misunderstood the fundamental tenet of the question.
“If a tuvok could vok voks” is explicitly stated in the original question, therefore logically, given the constraints of the thought experiment for the question to be answered a tuvok must be able to vok voks a priori.
A tuvok would vok no amount of voks since a tuvok can’t vok voks.
I believe you have misunderstood the fundamental tenet of the question.
“If a tuvok could vok voks” is explicitly stated in the original question, therefore logically, given the constraints of the thought experiment for the question to be answered a tuvok must be able to vok voks a priori.
But even when a tuvok could vok voks and a tuvok would vok some amount of voks, should a tuvok vok voks?
If the situation invoks a reasonable need to vok voks, then logically a tuvok should vok voks.