• Successful_Try543
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know about the way Romans counted time. Isn’t also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus? Later, the pope who established the AD counting had lots of struggle summing up all the years of the emperors without counting some years twice.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep! In the Empire, there were often numerous consuls in a year instead of just two (being rotated out as a kind of ‘gift’ from the Emperor) so the norm for counting the year changed to how many years since the ruling Emperor came into power.

      Funny how some things we take for granted, like an unborked date system, are actually innovations, and far from timeless (ha).

      • Successful_Try543
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        TY, I didn’t know, there were still consules in the Roman Empire.
        Yes, a continuous calendar system makes things a lot easier.

    • wanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus?

      No, it isn’t. Descriptions of when he was born are vague and contradictory.

      • Successful_Try543
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Indeed, e.g. the text of the Lukas Evangelium isn’t that precise as I’ve thought I remember it.