I have a number of Lemmy instances meant for discussion groups around specific topics. They are not being as used as I expected/hoped. I would like to set them up in a way that they can be owned by a consortium of different admins so that they are collectively owned. My only requirement: these instances should remain closed for registrations and used only to create communities.

  • Blaze
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Just yesterday I renewed 10 of these domains. That cost me ~400€. I renewed nba.space and nfl.community last month, each cost ~650€. Running all these instances is costing me ~200€/month.

    Thank you for providing the numbers, these domains are quite pricey if you have to pay 1700 € per year on domains alone.

    • rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Stop thinking in terms of prices, and start thinking in terms of value. A three-letter domain for less than 1000€ is a bargain.

      • Blaze
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m thinking in terms of costs because those could prevent any admins potentially interested in joining you to do so.

        Lemmy.ml still runs on a server which costs 80€ per month (https://lemmy.ml/comment/13507604). A .ml domain name costs 61€ per year on gandi.

        Your hosting costs are 2.5x higher, your domain costs are 27 times higher.

        Maybe you’ll find other admins who agree with you that it’s worth it.

          • Blaze
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            52 minutes ago

            You are asking a consortium of different admins to collectively own those instances with you.

            If the idea is that those other admins can take over should something happen to you, then it makes sense for them to assess whether the whole project is viable from a financial perspective, otherwise it would just lead to them closing most of the instances, which is just the same as them not owning those instances with you.

            • rglullis@communick.newsOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              29 minutes ago

              There are plenty of ways where people can enter into an equity agreement without having to pay directly with money.

              can take over should something happen to you

              Are you trying to get rid of me? Then why are you arguing as if (a) something bad might happen to me or (b) I am somehow unable/unfit to manage this?

              No matter what I do/offer/propose, you will always try to find an excuse to rationalize your unwillingness to contribute to what I am doing, like I’m failing some type of BS purity test.