• superkret
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve literally never used the headphone jack on a phone in 10 years.
    And I wonder how many would still want it back if they realized the phones then were bricked after getting submerged in water like they used to.

    • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      There are many phones with a headphone jack that have an IP68 rating which invalidates your whole point. If the headphone jack was so compromising then Apple would have needed to remove the charging port as well.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        many phones with a headphone jack that have an IP68 rating which invalidates your whole point

        Typing on one right now.

      • InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        A sick and twisted part of me wants to see charging ports removed too. Every port! Make it IP69+ compliant. Maybe then the careless kids I know might keep a device alive for more than a year. Ultimately all that would do is barely solve one problem and introduce a whole lot of other problems.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Phones became waterproof before removing headphone jacks became a trend. You’re talking nonsense.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      About 10 years ago I used headphones daily, now I do so just frequently enough that it’s irritating to realize I need to purchase a dongle just to do so and go “well I guess I’m not listening to music/podcasts right now”

      What I learned when working for a phone manufacturer is that the headphone jack usage varies by product segment. Cheaper phone users use the headphone jack far more frequently than premium phone users, so they’d keep it on the budget models but drop it on the higher end models. They also did similar with NFC and wireless charging which was interesting…

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve literally never used the headphone jack on a phone in 10 years

      We understood that as soon as you said “literally”.

      I’ve not used on*star, a fire extinguisher or a #2 pencil in a while either, but I bet they’re important. Beware false consensus.

    • Roldyclark@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I do. I don’t use wireless headphones, and the dongle sucks. And hate having earbuds with a proprietary jack I can’t use elsewhere. Plus I used my iPhone as a synth/drum machine and needed to charge and play at the same time.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      Most people don’t use them and never did, all the people downvoting are just salty because they’re not the target audience.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Nope.

            if they realized the phones then were bricked after getting submerged in water like they used to.

            This is not subjective, it’s objectively false.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                So we agree, you were wrong about it “all being subjective opinion.”

                • refalo@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  No, something being objective or not is still someone’s opinion ultimately. And there’s still no right or wrong. There’s subjective and objective, though.

                  • null@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 days ago

                    No, something being objective or not is still someone’s opinion ultimately.

                    Absolutely incorrect.

                    And there’s still no right or wrong.

                    Also incorrect. Right and wrong exist. For example, you’re wrong right now.