• Johanno
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Because the opposite is the case. A surrender would stop the war.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      What on earth makes you think that after:

      • Israel have declined the dozens of ceasefires offered to them (unlike those Hamas monsters)

      • Israel funded Hamas’ displacement of the secular moderates (why if not to manufacture the pretext for this genocide at the predictable expense of Israeli lives?)

      • Israel have maintained Palestine as an open air concentration camp (UN and Human Rights Watch’s words not mine) for decades, controlling movement, trade, food, water, power, and “policing” them oppressively in a manner that bears no resemblance to their policing of Israelis

      • Israel spent decades killing and displacing God knows how many Palestinians in an obvious attempt to drive them out and steal their land

      • Israel have committed countless warcrimes (both before and since October 7th), killed the most journalists and aid workers per day of any conflict in history, and killed tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians while refusing to hold the IDF accountable for the warcrimes they’re shamelessly posting online for clout.

      • Israel just can’t stop screaming genocidal rhetoric like calls for a second, larger Amalek, the extermination of Palestinians, and calling Palestinians animals.

      A surrender would stop the war in that Israel would simply wrap up their genocide faster and have noone left to murder… but I’m not a fucking demon, so I see that as an acceptable outcome.

      Is your solution to school shootings to have all the schoolkids line up in an orderly fashion to be executed? I’d hate to think you wrapped your evil in a bow of inconsistency.