Highway spending increased by 90% in 2021. This is one of many reasons why car traffic is growing faster than population growth.

  • Novamdomum@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    Walking: Can’t cover large distances quickly. Not sure why that’s even included in this?

    Bus: Pollution source whether it carries passengers or not. No service in rural areas. 1 crash = 69 people injured. Pathogen hotbox. You can’t smash in one.

    Bicycle: 1 thunderstorm = misery. Limited range and can’t travel on motorways/freeways.

    Car: Only pollutes when you use it. Goes anywhere you want 24/7/365. You can definitely smash in one. Carries big things like a trolley full of groceries or IKEA furniture.

    E-Cars etc.: All the benefits of the car plus no pollution. Huge smugness boost.

    • sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m not against having a car for when I need it. I’m against pretty much requiring it to be a functional adult to do just about anything without public transit becoming my new hobby.

      Work: 20min drive, 1h 20min transit, 2h bike

      Groceries: 10min drive, 45min transit

      This includes a bunch of walking to/from stops and half the time spent waiting since my city’s public transit hub/spoke model is designed for airplanes requiring you to bounce between hubs.

      There also isn’t consistency. A favorable route might only come once every few hours. If one hop is running late, it can wreck the whole route.

      My work route is pretty direct but it takes 12min walking, 0-20min waiting for a bus to my local hub, 0-40min waiting for the right train, and another 15min walking to the office. If they got those wait times down to like 10-20min total, I’d be more inclined to use it. Right now “something” comes every 20min, but sometimes the routes alternate so your route may come every 40min instead of 20min.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      adventures in missing the point and faulty comparisons.

      Also, cars are extremely wasteful when not in use. They have to be parked somewhere and that’s space not used productively.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Walking: a great form of transportation for short distances. However too much modern infrastructure gets in the way of walking. We should be able to walk more places than we do, even just from one store to the next. I did live in a city carlessly for a while and the combination of transit and walking was much more convenient than cars, most of the time

      Bus: if you don’t mind the audience ….

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      A car pollutes as its materials are mined from the ground and smelted into metals. A car pollutes when oils are refined for its various plastics and lubricants. A car pollutes when it is retired to a scrap yard to sit leaking oil until it is crushed and recyled (polluting through that process too).

      • Novamdomum@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        To be honest, I hadn’t even noticed that I was commenting in the “Fuck Cars” group cos I just responded to something that popped up in my feed. I’m not about trying to be disruptive in someone else’s house. I was going for humor more than anything. Sorry.

      • y0kai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        None of this is true for busses. They’re made of and run on magic