EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.

Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!

  • superkret
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    No one is willing to bet the existence of human civilization on that.
    Even 2-3 working nukes (out of thousands) would destroy dozens of cities (they each carry multiple warheads that split up in space).
    And it would still trigger a retaliatory strike that could cause a nuclear winter.