No one can mention any real life examples of both theories and that is because they are fictional theories.

  • Socialism assume that companies could work with no centralized ownership which is impossible in real life, it’s like the believers of this theory ignore all the human psychology and assume the perfection in the world.

  • Anarcho-Capitalisim assume that it’s possible to live in 100% autonomous society while ignoring all the big issues(unfair laws, corruption in law and protection agencies, …etc)

  • killingsparkEnglish
    16·
    2 months ago

    Socialism assume that companies could work with no centralized ownership which is impossible in real life, it’s like the believers of this theory ignore all the human psychology and assume the perfection in the world.

    That’s like saying democracy can’t work because without central ownership the state would fall apart. Socialism isn’t one clear cut thing, it’s about distributing economic power (more) equally. Strengthening the power of the workers by making company decisions more democratic, involving the workers employed by the company, doesn’t seem infeasible.

      • killingsparkEnglish
        51·
        2 months ago

        If that’s supposed to be tankie bait it’s way too obvious my friend.

        Of course there are many companies that are actually run as collectives, everyone owning their share, everyone contributing what they can, only taking what they need. No they are not in the Fortune 500. No that doesn’t mean they aren’t successful.