• timestatic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    So we have an undemocratic state if voting one out of two candidates gets you in jail. This is literally the playbook definition of an autocracy. He should be judged by the actions he took and shouldn’t be above the law like the supreme court decided but judging the voters is crazy

    • mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is literally the playbook definition of an autocracy. He should be judged by the actions he took and shouldn’t be above the law like the supreme court decided but judging the voters is crazy

      He’s not above the law. Congress Impeached him for it and 57 Senators (less than the 67 needed) voted to convict (including 7 Republicans). But the Democrats rushed it for political reasons. The Nixon Impeachement process took 9 months and it had several hearings evidentiary and others that gave Republicans who didn’t and couldn’t support impeachment at the start of the process justify impeachment to their constituents. Impeachment is a political process, and Dems politicked like morons.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      So we have an undemocratic state if voting one out of two candidates gets you in jail.

      The Tolerance Paradox is only resolved when you refuse to tolerate intolerance.

      • timestatic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Then drop the candidate but not the masses voting for change.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Since we’re wishcasting here, I’d say “¿Por Qué No Los Dos?”

          But I agree, getting fascists off the ballot would be the highest imperative. I’d also say that we’re not going to do either, so getting angry at someone online for suggesting either one seems silly.