• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      We live in a system that monetizes everything, then seeks to restrict access to those things in order to profit.

      Knowledge is just one casualty.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Scarcity is money and if there is no scarcity laws will be bought to to artificially create said scarcity.

    • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      No one is preventing you from visiting a library, which would be a fesible alternative.

      However, not a simple solution for everyone in every country. Knowlegde should be a free and shared common good.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        No one is preventing you from visiting a library, which would be a fesible alternative.

        actually blatantly wrong, public libraries are slowly dying and losing funding.

      • 01011@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That depends on where you live. The Internet Archive is far more accessible than a good library, for much of the global populace.

        • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That depends on where you live.

          Yes, I know. That’s why I said:

          However, not a simple solution for everyone in every country.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s not even limited by country. There are far too many places in well resourced countries that don’t have access to good (or any) libraries.

      • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, except scumbags like eric adams, NYC’s bought-owned-and-operated-by-real-estate-interests mayor.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Libraries where good for before the XXI century. Nowadays the amount of content they had is pretty small. Most libraries don’t really has anything but the more famous books.

        • Akrenion@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They became community hubs that offer more than just books. Even ebooks albeit that being weirdly capped by publishers as well.

          They do much more than public opinion would make you believe.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            True, but that doesn’t change the fact that specific books can be hard to find. Libraries are great, but they don’t solve the problem IA solves.

            • Akrenion@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              We got a nationwide network of specific books. You can order books to your local library if you are a little patient. They might not have a lot of selfpublished books but that is a problem of scale and negotiating power of publishers.