• Aarkon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t get where did you even suddenly put in the word “desirable”.

    You used Clausewitz’ description in terms of legitimizing war as a matter of politics (as you opposed someone else sarcastically saying you had to accept war as a matter of dispute between nations). If that was not your intention, then your post contains mostly whataboutism, pointing at others doing the same (?) thing in order to not be accused for something.

    Obviously some wars are better than the others, for example liberation wars, while US imperialist wars are utterly reprehensible.

    Yeah. If you say so.

    250+ conflict since WW2 can attest

    It’s 77 years since the end of WWII. There are around 200 countries in the world (also depending on how Mother Russia feels today about further annexations). A “conflict” is an extremely wide term. Therefore, I’m surprised it’s not more than that.
    Politics are very different today than in the time of Bonaparte, therefore war as a matter of those and the reasons for it are hardly the same. So what I don’t get is why you pull out that 200 years old quote to excuse nations colliding in war in modern times. Yes, war is a reality. Of course it is, nobody ever denied that, just look what a great point you made there! But hell, do we have to like that or drop every effort to overcome it? Europe for instance lives in peace since the end of Nazi Germany, which is probably the longest period since, I don’t know, like ever? Yeah, not everybody was happy with every compromise that came with that peace. But I suggest that those were/are still better than open war.

    Let ideas fight & die, not people.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      First off right, that was not you, my mistake.

      legitimizing war as a matter of politics

      War is legitimate manners of doing politics, nothing whataboutist with that. We might discuss if it should or shouldn’t be, but the fact is that it absolutely is and always was, i don’t know what is so controversial in this. Even if some countries like USA or Russia think it’s not a war when you don’t delcare it. By “conflict” i meant “armed conflict”, including border skirmishes, putches, or USA wrecking countries for 20+ years without officially declaring war.

      Yeah. If you say so.

      Nice to see you support national, class etc. oppression, because that is what you do after saying no war is ever just.

      Therefore, I’m surprised it’s not more than that.

      Hah and you jest you don’t see war as legit politic!

      Politics are very different today than in the time of Bonaparte

      Material conditions change and the politics with them, obviously. Btw the Vienna congress still shaping current politics and events to a certain extent.

      I will leave the rest of idealist liberal nonsense without comment, maybe except one thing:

      Europe for instance lives in peace since the end of Nazi Germany, which is probably the longest period since, I don’t know, like ever?

      Having cold war with two nuclear powers and iron curtain probably had something to do with this. As is the first time Europe was mostly united militarily under NATO as de facto US protectorate. Also not very nice of you to igore half of the world pillaged by USA and their european pals, especially since 1991.

      So as every imperialist, you write a lot of words without meaning to ultimately end at the position of defending pax americana. Coincidentally with above ironical “If you say so.” to suggestion that people can defend themself, pacifist when your side dominates. How predictable.

      • Aarkon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Always interested to see what you try to make out of my words. You could have been a gifted sculptor for all I know, you neither lack imagination nor the aspiration to transform stuff into something completely different.

        I didn’t say basically anything you imply and have not enough time nor energy to waste in “discussions” with fundamentalists, so I’ll just conclude my annotations to your pseudointellectual ramblings with another “if you say so”.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh look, Varjolintu 2. Or maybe even 1, you seem to always arrive when he’s banned and have literally the same methods of trolling 101.

          • Aarkon@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            This fruit is just too sweet not to reap it: It’s really cute how it doesn’t fit into your head how more than one person in the world doesn’t share your view about the same.

            So much imagination in one place, so little in the other!