• mihnt@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why are you using VGA when DVI-D exists? Or Displayport for that matter.

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Why should I? Full HD and working well, no reason to do so, new displays are 100€+ which is freaking expensive for that improvement

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      All those new video standards are pointless. VGA supports 1080p at 60Hz just fine, anything more than that is unnecessary. Plus, VGA is easier to implement that HDMI or Displayport, keeping prices down. Not to mention the connector is more durable (well, maybe DVI is comparable in terms of durability)

      • mihnt@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think you are speaking on some very different use cases than most people.

        • renzev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Really, what “normal people” use cases are there for a resolution higher than 1080p? It’s perfectly fine for writing code, editing documents, watching movies, etc. If you are able to discern the pixels, it just means you’re sitting too close to your monitor and hurting your eyes. Any higher than 1080p and, at best you don’t notice any real difference, at worst you have to use hacks like UI Scaling or non-native resolution to get UI elements to display at a reasonable size.

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Its unneeded perfectionism that you get used to. And its expensive and makes big tech rich. Know where to stop.