• TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Bare shelves during the COVID-19 pandemic may have made inventory managers more conservative. That more conservative approach to inventories, in turn, could have generated a wider gap between output prices (where higher prices diminish end demand and therefore boost inventories) and input prices…Output prices rose significantly more than input prices, i.e., firms hiked margins, potentially as a mechanism to better conserve inventory…(Note that this potential driver of COVID-era margin expansion is distinct from and potentially more plausible than “greedflation.”)

    Maybe it started out as inventory managers trying to conserve inventory due to uncertainty, but if you look at the charts, output prices spiked even after input prices had come down significantly, and after supply chains had normalized considerably. I think once the businesses saw that people were still buying at the higher prices, and the record profits they were making, they couldn’t turn down the opportunity. It was probably a combination of inventory management and greedflation. There’s no reason why it has to be only one or the other.

    • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It was probably a combination of inventory management and greedflation. There’s no reason why it has to be only one or the other.

      https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/corporate-greed-not-blame-price-pressures-fed-study-shows-2024-05-13/

      Corporate price gouging has not been a primary driver of U.S. inflation, according to research published on Monday by economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

      While markups for motor vehicles and petroleum products did rise sharply during the 2021-2022 inflation surge, markups across the entire spectrum of U.S. goods and services have been relatively flat during the post-pandemic recovery, the bank’s latest Economic Letter showed.

      “As such, rising markups have not been a main driver of the recent surge and subsequent decline in inflation during the current recovery,” wrote the bank’s research chief Sylvain Leduc and colleagues Huiyu Li and Zheng Liu.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s a different article. In the original article you posted, the included charts (charts 5 and 6) clearly show a spike in output prices, even after input prices had come down significantly, as I said.

          • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Well, maybe the analysts at the Fed made their determination prematurely. Maybe it’s a blind spot in their analysis. I don’t think companies planned it, necessarily. I’m sure they were as surprised as anyone that consumers were paying the higher prices, but the businesses were, nonetheless, more than happy to reap the rewards. I don’t think it’s that unbelievable. That’s why businesses exist, to make as much profit as possible. If consumers are willing to give them more money, they’ll take it. I certainly don’t expect them to turn down the extra profits.

              • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m not sure the data backs up what the Fed is claiming. Regardless, data doesn’t necessarily tell the whole story, and if you look only at numbers, figures, and ratios, your analysis is likely insufficient.

                • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I disagree entirely. I would counter that your unsourced personal opinion does not counter data.

  • Xhieron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Holy shit, actual analysis from a thinktank! And here I was so used to thinly veiled lobbying, propaganda pieces, and bribery that I had begun to think the American research institute was dead.

    On the actual substance: if this is true, it should be good politically, but I suspect that recovery from the lingering economic trauma arising from inflation (real or imagined) will lag even further. People feel like prices are still rising too fast, whether they actually are or not, and the aforementioned propaganda engine doesn’t help.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Usually what happens is that a Democrat works their ass off fixing the economy, the felt effects lag, and a Republican gets to grunt about how great “their economy” is.

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Straight from the regime propaganda original source folks!!!

    • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hilarious :)

      https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brookings-institute/

      Overall, we rate Brooking Institution Left-Center biased based on donations to primarily Democratic candidates and policy advocacy that slightly favors the left. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 5/15/2016) Updated (12/22/2023)

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Output prices rose significantly more than input prices, i.e., firms hiked margins, potentially as a mechanism to better conserve inventory…(Note that this potential driver of COVID-era margin expansion is distinct from and potentially more plausible than “greedflation.”)