• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    and just like in biology, you need a system to fight the cancer, you can’t just wish it away.

    since we’ve refused to maintain such an immune system, we’re now going to have to go through a miserable period of chemo treatment to rid ourselves of the tumors.

  • rchive@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where did this meme of “capitalism requires infinite growth, therefore it’s impossible and bad” come from? Capitalism doesn’t require infinite growth, the universe has basically infinite resources, modernity which is largely but not exclusively caused by capitalism has allowed us to do so much more with fewer resources than generations previous, and as societies get richer in material wealth they produce fewer children and have the luxury to pay attention to things like the environment and their impact on it.

  • Great_Devil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    in biology normal cells are controlled by nucleus and it’s hereditory… so it is nepotism and zero rights for others so it’s also bad thing like communism

    • Plaksys@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand how nepotism and zero rights for others automaticaly imply communism.

  • sk_slice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not to be that guy, but animals of certain size are seemingly unaffected by cancer. I think Kurzkezadt (or however you spell it lol) did a video on why whales don’t die from cancer.

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Economic output doesn’t have a 1:1 relationship with the planet’s resources. Many countries grow by offering services as opposed to goods. Not all goods have the same negative externalities in terms of harming the planet.

  • Nobsi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalism isn’t killing our planet. Shits like Putin, Winnie Pooh, Kim Jong Un and Erdogan are.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      China has met and exceeded every climate goal they have set. However, Putin is just as responsible for killing the planet as the USA, and for the record Russia is a Capitalist economy. Lol, lmao even

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both are killing our planet, they are not mutually exclusive. Capitalism kills the planet through the destruction of the environment on a global scale for profit, the abuse and wage enslavement of the working class (and the rapidly decreasing standard of living for many because of this) and the hoarding of resources for a profit at the expense of those who actually need it. Homeless people starving to death outside of supermarkets, people losing their homes from skyrocketing rents and stagnant wages or never being able to afford one because greedy corporations buy up all the homes. How can you claim unchecked capitalism isn’t a scourge on our society and a root of so many of our problems?

      You don’t need go be a genocidal dictator to kill the planet. All you need is greed, lack of empathy, and the means to hurt people for profit.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m all for an individual decreasing their own consumption for the environment. I try to do that. But decreasing someone else’s quality of life is where it gets dicy. You can very easily get discrimination.

      • Zacryon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, those billionaires will have a hard time to be only allowed millions instead. /s

  • Rolder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a fan of capitalism with tight regulations and checks on corruption, personally

    • SeethingSloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The very nature of capitalism facilitates concentrations of power, which will utilize that power to accumulate even more in any conceivable way. The system is fundamentally flawed and needs to be replaced if we care at all for basic human rights and a future for this species.

  • cricket98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there any evidence socialism can actually work at scale? What if capitalism is the best we got?

    • gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe that socialism doesn’t work at scale, but it doesn’t need to. I’m all for making smaller communities. Then socialism does work.

  • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a popular take that is just completely wrong. Capitalism as a system does not require growth. Capitalism is a system in which the factors of production are owned by private parties and can be freely traded. The capitalists believe is that markets will allocate those factors of production to the owners that can best exploit them. This can result in growth, but it isn’t necessary for the system to function.

    There are literally a thousand issues with the system ranging from inequality to environmental concerns to market concentration (all of which capitalists tend to ignore). I really do not understand why people pick this one to quibble over.