• waitmarks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone should tell Elon that an unprofitable website and a non-profit website are not the same thing.

  • catgirl2005@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there anything that stops Elon Musk from buying Lemmy or Mastadon? Even if everyone were to migrate over to the Fediverse, what stops these websites from being bought as well?

    • Sidyctism@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The fact that lemmy and mastodon arent websites, they are collections of connected instances which are managed by individuals and collectives. Elon could set up his own instance, or try to buy all the existing ones, but that wouldnt stop others from setting up new ones as well. The lemmy website is just an aggregator, each instance has its own website as well.

  • PlexSheep@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a heads up, you can download all of wikipedias Text in a couple Gigabyte iirc. So we could easily “fork” and mirror it.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I completely hate how something that is a rare Bastian of maintaining free and reliable factual information for the world is just a silly game for him. It sickens me. This is the kind of cartoon character rich villain that throws money a people and shouts at them to dance for him.

    • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      reliable

      Wikipedia

      It’s literally a meme how you can’t trust anything you see on there except for the most objective, undeniable facts, because you never know what page has been camped by an editor with an agenda or just a possessive streak. On anything even slightly subjective. I know there’s good editors, I know it’s a majority of them, but the problem is that the bad ones exist and so you can’t trust any given page isn’t poisoned.

      Also, relatedly, the entire backend is an ever-growing morass of petty politics and tangled policies that serve mostly as a barrier to entry. They’ve been saying admin and power-editor retention is a huge problem for well over a decade, and yet they keep making it worse. At this point, the majority of their admins are from 2005, with only 10% from after 2010, because nobody bothers getting started when the prerequisites to making even a small edit can be learning the wikipedia legal system.

      • philpo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, he would get offended - just like he is now with Wikipedia. And even more offended when other people are named “after him” without his control. And even more when they turn out to be people he hates.

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wikipedia should’ve agreed. Imagine for minimum a year, the whole world opening Wikipedia, gets reminded on the clown Elon Musk, again and again.

  • rustbuckett@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds awesome! Just think what it will do for the fediverse! Is anyone working on a decentralized Wikipedia yet?

    • narp@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Done! Never did before, but I guess the headline had the right effect.