Part of the reason these rules are similar is because AI-generated images look very dreamlike. The objects in the image are synthesized from a large corpus of real images. The synthesis is usually imperfect, but close enough that human brains can recognize it as the type of object that was intended from the prompt.

Mythical creatures are imaginary, and the descriptions obviously come from human brains rather than real life. If anyone “saw” a mythical creature, it would have been the brain’s best approximation of a shape the person was expecting to see. But, just like a dream, it wouldn’t be quite right. The brain would be filling in the gaps rather than correctly interpreting something in real life.

The biggest tells for me is the sharpness of the picture. AI pictures have an uncanny valley level of sharpness that doesn’t match what actual humans would put in their art.

This is actually terrifying. Even if it was fiction, what gave the person the impulse and creativity to write something like this.

Edit: I’m looking for a source on that quote and can’t find anything. If there is something I’d be interested to read more