• Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I don’t think they’d find that very insightful.

    It’s plain hedonism. I’m sure they’re familiar with the idea.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Bentham developed hedonistic calculus. The foundation is a multivariate ethical vector space. He rationalized hedonism to the extreme. The passions are explicitly tempered for a calculated greater good.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            No? Once reason restricts passion, the hierarchy collapses. An action that causes yourself mild pain, but pleasure of greater extent to others, is preferable to an action that causes many others pain even if it gives you pleasure personally. Reason demands you restrain yourself from the passions that would harm others. That’s not unilateral fealty. Axioms must be assumed, but the most powerful systems assume as few as possible, and leave most of the legwork to reason.